[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Errata + Shashi
Dear Sanjeev + Ladies + Gentlemen
When I saw the subject "Errata + Shashi" I thought I was getting a mail
with all the spelling mistakes, missing words & incomplete sentences.
Pretty much like Sanjeev, I just type in a flow and when I am done I am
too exhausted to recheck it. :)
Sanjeev thanks for stretching your physical abilities to comment on my
reply. I sincerely appreciate it.
>May you live long enough to see that society established in India!
I hope so too, and much more than a life time I hope to see system
reform in 5-10 years and I am not going to rest till that happens.
>About
>yuppies believing in such things: I disagree. I can show you very old
>grandfathers in India who believe in such things. Rajaji was rather
>old when he broke up with Nehru to form a separate party opposed to
>socialism and promoting liberalism. JRD Tata was talking these things
>till the end of his life. I am very old too. I'll become a grandfather
>in about 20 years.
>
Ok on this, my reference to people of the older generations seems to
have implied that the previous generations per-se do not subscribe to
this school of thought. No that was not my intention, I perhaps chose
the wrong example. The point however I was trying to make and I referred
to in another mail today was this.
- I did not refer to the Capitalism vs Socialism debate
- I referred to the "Individual Centric-WorldView" the
declaration talks about to the "Community-Centric" reality that
makes up most of India.
- I believe that one should not link a "Community-Centric" world
view necessarily to "Socialism".
- The community centric order India is very strong
- Its not socialist in its nature or dynamics.
- In fact today I see a race between communities trying to outdo
each other.
- The race is visibly for political dominance.
e.g. Dalit Political Movement, The Yadav & Other OBCs
emergence as Political forces in almost every
state.
- At a more higher level of abstraction its also a race to replace
a de-facto world-view with theirs.
e.g. The Dalit or Yadav movements philosophy or world-view
is hardly scientific but has the sole objective of questioning
and challenging the existing so called "Manuvadi" or
"Brhamnaic Order".
- Both of these movements though find as their natural allies the
Leftists, do not have a socialist agenda but an agenda which
seeks to give them "Political Power" & hence "Economic Power".
- Hence if you contrast each of these communities they are actually
highly self centred and are all seeking self advancement but at
a community level.
- You talked of feudalism in India, yes the pre-Independence India
was fuedal, but the present day society though still stratified
along community lines is not feudal. Its not Fuedal because there
is no heirarchy any more.
- The hierarchy has blurred, all are equally empowered to struggle.
- So as opposed to a free society where every individual is
empowered to participate in the race for excellence, we have in
India a race between communities which are equally empowered.
- Hence the Fractured Mandates & Splintered Verdicts, 18 party
coalitions and Hung Parliaments.
My question is, Given this social order :
"How relevant are we to set an agenda for this society by thinking
along fixed models of Capitalism & Socialism."
I am not well versed in Economics, I need to read all of them,
especially Adam Smith, but I am sure that we need to think beyond these
traditional models. The Inter-Community Dynamics are a fact and
they wont vanish anytime next century. We need a model which accounts
for the uniqueness of this social order.
I would love to be enlightened on this, I dont have an answer for this
but I want to know if the question is relevant or not.
regards
shashi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the National Debate on System Reform. debate@indiapolicy.org
Rules, Procedures, Archives: ../debate/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------