[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Just hit a GOLDMINE!!!
Ratan: don't be taken in by the Skinnerians. If you want to know what
happened as a result of Skinner's experiments, investigate how his own
daughter fared.
But to the point: electoral reforms will not work in the absence of
basic honesty:
1. who will guarantee the quality of qualifications of those who wish
to contest election (i.e. whether or not the qualifications were
gained by cheating in exams - a practice that is increasingly
widespread in India)?
2. Who will guarantee that auditing and filing of tax return on the
donations received by political parties has been done accurately and
comprehensively - when nothing to do with the government is done
accurately and comprehensively, at least when it comes to money (or am
I exaggerating)?
Can these "guaranteers" not be bribed?
It is only when you get some one (or a few people) who is/are
"unbribable" AND in authority that you have any chance of making any
system work.
As for transparency ("which implies public exposure and embarrasment--
a kind of social or conditioned punishment") that only works in a
culture where there is a minimum of conscience left. Let me not name
names (I am ignorant of libel laws on the Internet), but am I wrong in
asserting that there are many publicly-known criminals in power? Has
their public exposure resulted in any embarrassment on their part or
on the part of their supporters? Not to my knowledge. I would go so
far as to say that at least some of these individuals have publicly
scorned the notion that they should be embarrassed; to the contrary,
they are proud of being what they are and of doing what they have
done.
To refer to another message from another person on the list: is it
necessary for us all to undergo religious conversion of some sort and
become Jews, Catholics or Protestants if the country is to be saved?
I do not know. But a minimum number of people who are uncorruptable
and are prepard to sacrifice their careers as well as the future of
their families is needed if Indian politics is to be cleaned up. If
it takes "obscurantism" to produce this quality of commitment, I don't
mind it (if obscurantism does not come in too great a quantity!). The
motivation for that kind of commitment cannot IMO come from anything
as shallow as psychological or social engineering, and any thing as
shallow as electoral reform will certainly not clean up public life in
India. Let me remind you of an old adage: "a people get the rulers
they deserve" (in other words, in the long run, the moral level of
politicians and public servants will be roughly on a par with that of
the public they are supposed to serve). At least, that is so in a
democratic society - though some would argue that that is also so in
non-democratic societies.
Prabhu
______________________________ Reply Separator
Have been lurking and reading the postings. Here is my 2-cent contribution: The
Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner wrote on cultural or social engineering.
In fact there was a journal "Journal of Behavioral Engineering".
B.F. Skinner wrote a novel "Twin Oakes". There were started actual experimental
communes on experimental living styles, some of which were along the
lines of Twin Oakes.
The core is: If you want some specific behavior from humans, then you
have to create a external conditions suitable for that. Don't blame the
humans. Spell out the conditions and create them. A good start is the
electoral reforms, qualifications of those who wish to contest election,
auditing and filing of tax return on the donations received by political
parties and of course transparency (which implies public exposure and
embarrasment-- a kind of social or conditioned punishment).
Ratan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a posting to India_Policy Discussion list: india_policy@cine.net
Rules, Procedures, Archives: http://www.indiaconsult.com/indiapolicy/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------